The Microsoft recommendation regarding the order in which the Exchange 2013 server roles should be introduced into a forest is the reverse of Exchange 2010. Mailbox role first & it does make sense. Why?

 

In the Exchange 2010 world, the order of installation was CAS, Hub & Mailbox, whereas in 2013, it is Mailbox first & then CAS. Why is it different in 2013?

--> Please see the rest on the blog : http://www.howexchangeworks.com/2012/10/exchange-2013-server-roles-installation-order-mailbox-first.html